Home   Help Search Login Register  

Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror  (Read 338 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by lysander on: November 13, 2009, 05:39:04 AM »
lysander
(512 posts)
Offline View Profile

Daniel Radcliffe may sue the Daily Mirror after it alleged he smoked cannabis at a party. He has denied the allegations and may take legal action. Will he perform serious magic or will he let the paper escape?
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Rosie-Lee on: November 13, 2009, 10:47:32 AM »

Rosie-Lee
(4051 posts)
Offline View Profile

Yes, I saw that report this morning.  Some partygoer there thought they would make a bit of dosh from the papers, it seems.  Daniel is supposed to be an occasional roll-up fan, with nothing more than tobacco in it.  I know roll-ups look suspiciously like spliffs, although he is supposed to have been shouting about loving weed.  'Spect he was talking about Bill & Ben.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Trudy on: November 13, 2009, 04:53:06 PM »

Trudy
(24859 posts)
Offline View Profile

Problem is nowadays it is so easy to alter photo and video tapes that there will always be a low life trying to sell a story to the media to make money.  The papers are also too keen to print stories/photo's without varifying whether it's true, they sell lots of papers then print a little paragraph saying it's untrue sorry half way through the paper and pay damages. Considering the extra money they have made it's nothing and the damage to the celebrities reputation cannot be repaired because there is always someone that will say there is no smoke without fire. Where the media is concerned there is because they will exaggerate something beyond belief, until the media, journalists etc develop a conscience and scruples it will never change which is why most people do not believe what is written in the press.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Bashir on: November 14, 2009, 11:31:22 AM »

Bashir
(383 posts)
Offline View Profile

Hi friends...

the media's prime objective: IS NEWSPAPER SALES ..increases....

policy:  sell more newspapers ..make more ££millions..

BUT ...
a forlorn hope...the world'd or UK ...media developing a conscience...


I think...the media do have genuinely....the public interest in mind....
and will guide the UK public towards better understanding...of what is GOOD FOR THEM..clarify uncertainities..EXPOSE NAUGHTY PEOPLE..!
etc etc

 Smiley    Smiley    Smiley    Smiley   Smiley    Smiley 
have FUN GIRLS...
bashir xx

QUOTE:  until the media, journalists etc develop a conscience


Problem is nowadays it is so easy to alter photo and video tapes that there will always be a low life trying to sell a story to the media to make money.  The papers are also too keen to print stories/photo's without varifying whether it's true, they sell lots of papers then print a little paragraph saying it's untrue sorry half way through the paper and pay damages. Considering the extra money they have made it's nothing and the damage to the celebrities reputation cannot be repaired because there is always someone that will say there is no smoke without fire. Where the media is concerned there is because they will exaggerate something beyond belief, until the media, journalists etc develop a conscience and scruples it will never change which is why most people do not believe what is written in the press.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by AGEING TART on: November 14, 2009, 05:47:42 PM »

AGEING TART
(5356 posts)
Offline View Profile

Hi friends...

the media's prime objective: IS NEWSPAPER SALES ..increases....

policy:  sell more newspapers ..make more ££millions..

BUT ...
a forlorn hope...the world'd or UK ...media developing a conscience...


I think...the media do have genuinely....the public interest in mind....
and will guide the UK public towards better understanding...of what is GOOD FOR THEM..clarify uncertainities..EXPOSE NAUGHTY PEOPLE..!
etc etc

 Smiley    Smiley    Smiley    Smiley   Smiley    Smiley 
have FUN GIRLS...
bashir xx

QUOTE:  until the media, journalists etc develop a conscience



We do love our media debates Bashir.

Isn't Daniel Radcliff the lad who played Harry Potter?

If so this is probably a bad example for the young if it is true.

Maureen
Ageing tart
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Gerard on: December 03, 2009, 02:54:26 AM »

Gerard
(4535 posts)
Offline View Profile

Actually, I don't mind if he was smoking it or not - he's still got a right to a private life - and plenty of people smoke weed without it being a big deal.

I've actually found Daniel Radcliffe to be quite a sensible guy in interviews I've read, and he has some intelligent things to say. It doesn't affect my opinion of him one way or another.

What I would say though is that if he is suing them, then instead of a monetary settlement, perhaps he should insist on a civilised debate on the legality of cannabis in their newspaper - without sensationalism. That would be better than an apology or financial settlement, I think.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by AGEING TART on: December 07, 2009, 01:42:12 PM »

AGEING TART
(5356 posts)
Offline View Profile

Hello Gerard,

Do you think there is a real call to legalise Cannabis?

I know that some say it helps them deal with the symptoms of illness. 

I do know that drugs is a major issue in Britain largely because of the social reasons people have for taking the stuff.

Educationalists always take the view that unless its prescirbed its bad for you.

I have also heard of some extremely cynical views of why all drugs should be legalised not just Cannabis.

The views being that if people want to do away with themselves and become a right off why not. It would reduce the burden of the bludgeoning population.

I have issues with the cynics point of view and that is the effect of this on families and the innocent people caught in between, particularly children born addicted to heroin. Who have to be fostered at birth because their parents aren't fit.

Having said all this drugs is not a new issue especially in the music business.

Just watched a biopic of Ray Charles the other night and it was common practice even in the 1950's for artists to be addicts.

Maureen
Ageing tart
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Trudy on: December 07, 2009, 02:25:55 PM »

Trudy
(24859 posts)
Offline View Profile

Maureen, Very sadly nearly all babies that come into care now are those born to parents with alcohol or drug problems usually heroin, and the same mums continue to have  babies even after seeing them go through drug withdrawal symptoms it is heartbreaking to watch  Sad Shocked
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Rosie-Lee on: December 07, 2009, 02:28:54 PM »

Rosie-Lee
(4051 posts)
Offline View Profile

I believe cannabis is going through clinical trials at the moment to see if it is efficacious in conditions like MS.  Presumably if it proves to be so, it will get a product licence and be available on prescription for the appropriate patients only.  I know clinical trials can take a while, so I don't know how long it will be before they announce the results.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Trudy on: December 07, 2009, 02:34:12 PM »

Trudy
(24859 posts)
Offline View Profile

The concerns with Cannabis at the moment is that what is used now is Skunk and very powerful and much more dangerous than the  cannabis that people used to use.

A lot of people say that it relieves MS symptoms etc so it will be interesting to see what the results of these tests are.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Rosie-Lee on: December 08, 2009, 04:47:55 AM »

Rosie-Lee
(4051 posts)
Offline View Profile

The concerns with Cannabis at the moment is that what is used now is Skunk and very powerful and much more dangerous than the  cannabis that people used to use.

A lot of people say that it relieves MS symptoms etc so it will be interesting to see what the results of these tests are.

Yes, Trudy, I had read about the concerns regarding skunk and its serious strength and addiction levels.  Very worrying.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by AGEING TART on: December 08, 2009, 12:07:38 PM »

AGEING TART
(5356 posts)
Offline View Profile

Hello Trudy and Rosie - lee,

It will be interesting to read about the clinical trials results for Cannabis.

Meanwhile. I do wonder if the OAP in Northumberland is still making cake with it and serving it to her visitors?  As a big case was televised  a few years ago showcasing this old biddy who spoke up in its defence, saying it was noo worse than alcohol or smoking and did less damage than the latter two.

The babies you speak of Trudy do seem to suffer really badly as a result of mothers taking stuff whilst pregnant. Apparently even if drug us is kerbed for say 3 months or so before the birth the unborn child is tripping in the womb.

Maureen
ageing tart
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Gerard on: December 09, 2009, 03:57:14 AM »

Gerard
(4535 posts)
Offline View Profile

Surely though if light drugs are legalized and made available through *safe* channels, it's better for everybody? I know there'll always be the black market, but since the Government are happy with cigarette and alcohol addiction risks - why not just legalise it?

I'm not a drug taker in any way beyond the odd beer or wine, but I can't see any distinction between using cannabis socially than smoking or drinking. Harder drugs still neeed a hard line though.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by Rosie-Lee on: December 09, 2009, 05:50:15 AM »

Rosie-Lee
(4051 posts)
Offline View Profile

I believe that if cannabis is given a product licence as a prescription only drug (probably in some tablet or liquid form), it may open the debate wider about it being sold as a recreational drug.  But as long as you have such powerful stuff as skunk around, it may hold it back.  I do wonder if cannabis is any worse than excess alcohol or smoking.  I would like to see some easy to understand comparisons about the implications.  I understand that skunk, in particular, can cause or exacerbate mental health problems, but I had an uncle who suffered dementia through alcoholism.
Logged
Re: Daniel Radcliffe may sue Mirror
by AGEING TART on: December 10, 2009, 10:53:32 AM »

AGEING TART
(5356 posts)
Offline View Profile

Hello Rosie-Lee and Gerard,

I to would like to see some of the research results before they legalise any drug, particularly for the risks to health and of course pregnant women.

Maureen
Ageing tart
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Subscribe by RSS | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions of Use | Contact Us
Unless otherwise stated, all content of this site is copyright of Unrealitytv Limited, 2008 - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC